| gerryduffett |
|
|
gerryduffett Scarborough, ON |
Neurology and Mind Control :
A beneficial technology or ..........the opening of Pandora's Box ? by : Terilyn Lee Johnston Science, Technology, and the Pursuit of Truth 15 December 2002 Read Complete article located here : http://www.bethel.edu... Often the center-piece of science fiction and dramatic films such as Star Wars, A Clockwork Orange, and Conspiracy Theory, the idea of mind control is seemingly fantastical, unrealistic, and the invention of a ......right wing conspiracy theory created by those who fear the ......"Big Brother" government. The reality of scientific neurology research, however, is not contained within science fiction novels and films. Mind control is a very apparent and quickly developing area of science, one that merits extensive research and evaluation. This paper will evaluate the area of mind through five areas of analysis: * Historical developments, * the problems associated with mind control, * the benefits that are apparent within this area of research, * the implications upon society that are inherent in light of this science, * and finally proposed solutions that would remedy the problems that are existent within the status quo. Solutions and Further Suggestions It is clear that the technology of mind control faces some substantial challenges within the theoretical and practical realms of public life and thought. The solutions to issues such as the stigmas attached to mind control and the currently uninhibited realms of research abilities, are currently, unfortunately, ............rather general. First, there is an apparent need for public discourse on this subject as its implementation becomes far more "real" and plausible within the status quo. At the point that the public becomes involved in this discussion, the more imminent Congressional action on the subject will become. This leads to the second solution that, if implemented, would help to solve for the issues apparent in the status quo. This solution is simply the increase of ..........Congressional discussion as to the need to ..........regulate the extent of experimentation ..........that is allowed in the United States ..........in the field of mind control. The first, unfortunately failed, attempt by Senator John Glenn sets a precedent for legal and legislative dialogue on the subject. It is imperative for the future of this technology that .........the government takes a proactive approach .........to ensuring the safety of Americans .........from unregulated scientific experimentation. Precedent for regulatory action can be observed in legislation passed to prohibit the cloning of humans and certain types of experimentation with stem cells. The final solvent action that can be utilized to improve the negative prospects of mind control research is through simple education of the public at large. This, of course, includes the various venues of dialogue and publication from the scientific community. Currently most of the issues that are being presented are reported on by mainstream popular culture sources, which discredit the serious implications of this area of science as cosmetic and novel. The realization of the profound nature of neurology would lead to quick and effect action to further improve the current apathy that this society seems to exhibit toward mind control. As developments within the realm of neurological research race quickly from an area of black and white evaluation to a land of ...........fuzzy grayness, it is essential that this area be thoughtfully and carefully assessed. It is difficult to halt an advancing science, especially when it morphs into an entity fully supported by .........capitalist gain on a .........mainstream market of commercialization. The integrity of science must be preserved within this area of research and development, causing the containment of neurology, halting its intense escalation of momentum toward a status of unadulterated deregulation. The Economist expresses the evident need for further discussion of this topic and serves as a sufficient conclusion with the words, "If society is concerned about the pace and ethics of scientific advance, it should at least form a clearer picture of what is worth worrying about, and why" The Future of Mind Control, 2002. The time has come for society to realize the significance of this science and perform appropriate action. by : Terilyn Lee Johnston Read Complete article located here : http://www.bethel.edu... --------------------------- Gerry Duffett Toronto / Ontario / Canada gerryduffett47@yahoo.com gerryduffett@fastmail.ca http://gerryduffett.p... http://www.goliathboa... |
Powered by mvnForum





